Christian Living

E-Mail Newsletters

    • Study in My BST
    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss
    • Bookmark and Share
Product photo

AVERAGE USER RATING

Rate this article

God vs. Darwinism...Continued from page 2

Al Mohler

Dennett's excitement about Darwinism goes back to his childhood, when he and his friends would speculate about the existence and effect of a substance they called the "universal acid." "Universal acid is a liquid so corrosive that it will eat through anything! The problem is: what do you keep it in? It dissolves glass bottles and stainless-steel canisters as readily as paper bags. What would happen if you somehow came upon or created a dollop of universal acid? Would the whole planet eventually be destroyed? What would it leave in its wake? After everything had been transformed by its encounter with universal acid, what would the world look like?"

As an adult, Dennett now seizes upon Darwinism as the very universal acid that had fascinated his imagination as a boy. This universal acid is not a liquid substance, but an intellectual idea.

"Little did I realize that in a few years I would encounter an idea--Darwin's idea--bearing an unmistakable likeness to universal acid: it eats through just about every traditional concept, and leaves in its wake a revolutionized world-view, with most of the old landmarks still recognizable, but transformed in fundamental ways."

Transformed indeed. Dennett understands that every important idea and pattern of thought is instantly transformed if Darwinism is accepted as true. The evolutionary worldview of Darwinism, based in purely materialistic and naturalistic explanations of all phenomena, leaves no room for transcendent meaning, human dignity, morality, or hope. Human beings, along with the rest of the cosmos, are simply the accidental byproducts of vast cosmic forces.

Daniel C. Dennett understands all this, but exults in Darwin's "dangerous idea." Indeed, he suggests that he would award Darwin "the gold medal for the best idea anybody ever had." Remember Dennett the next time you hear the argument that evolution and Christianity are compatible. The basic incompatibility of Darwin's theory is the one facet of Dennett's thought we can truly appreciate. Now, if only his evolutionary colleagues would be equally candid.

__________________________________________________

R. Albert Mohler, Jr. is president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. For more articles and resources by Dr. Mohler, and for information on The Albert Mohler Program, a daily national radio program broadcast on the Salem Radio Network, go to www.albertmohler.com . For information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to www.sbts.edu . Send feedback to mail@albertmohler.com .

See also the most recent entries on Dr. Mohler's Blog .

[Editor's note: November 24, 2009 was the 150th anniversary of the release of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. This excerpt from Dr. Mohler's Blog originally appeared on Christianity.com in 2006 under the title: "Darwin's Dangerous Idea -- No Middle Ground."]

Previous | 1 | 2 | 3
Most Recent User Comments
Be the first to comment on this article!
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Christianity.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the oppurtunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!

Subscriber Login
Username
Password
Salem Web Network All-Pass: One account that can be used to log onto any page that displays this logo

Salem All-Pass: With one account, you can sign in on any site that displays the Salem All-Pass logo.