Lesson Seventeen
The Son of Man Tested
Mark 12
Knowing the Scriptures
Studies in the Gospel of Mark
LAST WEEK IN REVIEW
We have entered
Mark 11: The Son of Man Presented
Mark 12: The Son of Man Tested
Mark 13: The Son of Man Returning
Mark 14: The Son of Man Arrested
Mark 15: The Son of Man Crucified
Mark 16: The Son of Man Resurrected
DAY ONE: Parable of the Vineyard
Please carefully read Mark 12:1–12 and answer the following questions.
1. How did Jesus set the scene of this parable, and how did the tenants treat the representatives that the owner sent? (vv. 1–5)
2. Mark used many unique expressions in his record of this story. He used a word for winepress that is used nowhere else in the New Testament, although it was common in the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament) and in the Greek language;[i] wounded him in the head actually means to bring under heads or to summarize, then to hit on the head, and also is used only here in the New Testament. The following passages were no doubt very well understood by those who questioned Jesus in Mark 11. How do the passages clarify who and what the parable referred to?
Psalm 80:8–16; Isaiah 5:1–7
Jeremiah 25:4–7; Matthew 23:34–39
3. What did the owner then decide to do, and what was the result? (vv. 6–8)
SIDELIGHT: Leviticus 19
According to Leviticus 19:23–25, a farmer couldn’t use the fruit from a vineyard or farm until the fifth year. We don’t know if the Jews still followed this guideline at that time. To retain his legal rights to the property, the owner had to receive produce from the tenants, even if it was only some of the vegetables growing between the rows of trees or vines. This is most likely why the tenants refused to give him anything: they wanted to claim the vineyard for themselves. It also explains why the owner continued to send agents to them; it was a question of authority and ownership. If Mark 12:2–5 covers the years when the fruit wasn’t used, then it was in the fourth year that the beloved son was sent, the year the fruit was devoted to the Lord (Lev. 19:24). It also makes sending the son more meaningful. If the tenants could kill the heir, they would have a clear claim to the property, so they cast him out (see Heb. 13:12–13) and killed him. The son’s arrival possibly led to the tenants assuming the owner had died and this son was his only heir. In
4. In what dramatic way did Jesus wrap up this parable in verses 9–11, and what prevented the religious leaders from doing anything in retaliation for this? (v. 12)
5. What are a few other details that Matthew 21:40–46 records for us, and what is the obvious application for all of us in view of it?
Scripture Memory: This week we will be memorizing Mark 12:29–31a, a bit long but very important! Review the passage several times throughout the day each day this week, and by the end of the week, you should have it memorized completely.
Jesus answered him, "The first of all the commandments is: 'Hear, O
(Mark 12:29–31a nkjv)