Christian Foundations

    • Study in My BST
    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss
    • Bookmark and Share
Product photo

AVERAGE USER RATING

Rate this article

John Calvin's Legacy: The Theologian of Theologians

Dr. R.C. Sproul

Ligonier Ministries


Thinkers in the ancient world sought to plumb the depths of ultimate reality. With that quest for ultimate reality came the birth of the discipline of philosophy. Some philosophers focused on one particular aspect of philosophy called metaphysics (ultimate being). Others focused their attention on epistemology (the science of knowing). Still others stressed in their investigation the basic principles and elements of ethics (the study of the good and the right). And others focused on the ultimate foundations for aesthetics (the study of the beautiful). One philosopher stood out as being deeply involved in the study of all of these matters as well as others. His name was Aristotle. Because Aristotle’s philosophical investigation was so comprehensive that it encompassed all of the above concerns of philosophy, he earned for himself the supreme epithet, namely, “the Philosopher.” Among students of philosophy, if passing mention is made of the title “the Philosopher,” everybody understands that that title can be a reference to only one person — Aristotle.

In a similar manner, the study of theology historically has brought to the surface outstanding thinkers and scholars. Some are known for their specific ability to create a synthesis between theology and secular philosophy. Augustine, for example, was known for his ability to take precepts from the philosophy of Plato and blend them with biblical theology. Much of Augustine’s theology was therefore of a philosophical kind. The same could be said to a certain degree of Thomas Aquinas, who gave us a similar synthesis between Aristotelian philosophy and Christian thought. Among the sixteenth-century magisterial Reformers, we notice that Luther, being a brilliant student of language, brought to the theological table an uncanny ability to provide vignettes of insight into particular questions of truth. But Luther was not a systematician by nature, and so he could not be the theologian of theologians. He never developed a full-orbed systematic theology for the instruction of the church. That task in the sixteenth century was left to the genius of the Genevan theologian John Calvin.

Calvin brought to the study of theology a passion for biblical truth and a coherent understanding of the Word of God. Of all of the thinkers of the sixteenth century, Calvin was most noted for his ability to provide a systematic theological understanding of Christian truth. His magnum opus, Institutes of the Christian Religion, remains to this day a titanic work in the field of systematic theology. Luther did not live long enough to recognize the full impact of Calvin’s work, though he did see that Calvin would become a towering figure. It was left to one who knew Calvin and his work more extensively, namely, Philip Melancthon, Luther’s assistant and an impressive scholar in his own right, to give Calvin the sobriquet “the Theologian.” Thus, if one mentions “the Philosopher,” we understand that to mean a reference to Aristotle. On the other hand, if one mentions “the Theologian,” the heirs of the Reformation think exclusively of John Calvin.

1 | 2 | Next
Most Recent User Comments
eden1234
10/7/2009 9:33 PM
its just not biblical for people to put faith in a man made man inspired doctine such as tulip, the doctrine does not line up with the bible (limited atonement for example), yet there are those like john piper (and others)whom hold fast to this man made man inspired doctrine, what this does, is create 2 ideas of God when there is in fact only 1 - that is there is only 1 truth that Jesus died for all man kind without exception, not some men!

pastorship
7/17/2009 5:37 PM
Very well written article. Here's another Spurgeon quote I love, "Some call it Calvinism; I call it the Gospel." Calvin simply took the Gospel taught by Jesus, Paul and the other NT writers and put it together into a system. My favorite flower: TULIP!!! Much better than Daisies. You know, "He loves me, He loves me not..."
prwise
7/7/2009 11:15 AM
It is correct to say that Luther was more of an exegete than a systematician. However, that should not be taken to mean that Lutheranism lacks a "system." For that, one can look to the "second Martin", Martin Chemnitz and his Loci Theologici. Theological systems arise from and develop around a material principle. For Calvin the material principle was the sovereignty of God. For Luther it was salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. And this accounts for the difference in their systems. As for logic, I agree that modern evangelicalism often rejects and ignores logic. But it seems to me that Calvin sometimes let logic rule over the Word of God. E.g. his famous alleosis that "This is my body" means "This represents my body" because logic dictates that the finite cannot contain the infinite. If that is the case, what then do we make of the incarnation? This is why the work of the systematician must be limited by the work of the exegete.
Sign up to post your comments

It's quick and easy to register with Christianity.com! Just fill out the short form below. You'll have the oppurtunity to post comments, and be more involved in our community and forums. Plus, with this one account, you can sign in anywhere in our network of sites displaying the Salem All-Pass logo, including Oneplace.com, Christianity.com, Lightsource.com, Crosscards.com, and more!

Subscriber Login
Username
Password
Salem Web Network All-Pass: One account that can be used to log onto any page that displays this logo

Salem All-Pass: With one account, you can sign in on any site that displays the Salem All-Pass logo.